Philippe Le Billon: Wars of Plunder (Columbia University Press: 2012)

Philippe Le Billon’s Wars of Plunder takes previous research on the mathematical relationship between natural resources and conflict and combines this with qualitative understandings of power and space to create a nuanced explanation of how different natural resources relate to conflict.  Focusing initially on work done by economists such as Paul Collier and Macartan Humphreys, … Continue reading Philippe Le Billon: Wars of Plunder (Columbia University Press: 2012)

ArmsGlobe: Google, PRIO and the Igarape Institute map the arms trade

I was scanning the Huffington Post this morning and came across the headline Global Arms Trade From 1992-2010 Visualized By Google.  Tech, arms trading, and maps; sounded interesting since small arms control is something I'm deeply interested in.  Using the NISAT database, PRIO, Google and the Igarape Institute got together and created an interactive map of the global … Continue reading ArmsGlobe: Google, PRIO and the Igarape Institute map the arms trade

The Impact of Tech: Getting Past ‘Good Versus Bad’

The emergent theme from my travels this summer presenting academic papers on tech for social change hasn’t been “is it good or bad,” but instead “why are their good and bad outcomes, and can these be generalizable?” It’s this kind of question that motivates me as a political scientist.  Yes, indeed technology can be used … Continue reading The Impact of Tech: Getting Past ‘Good Versus Bad’

Crowdsourcing Done Well: A follow up from yesterday’s post

Yesterday's post may have been a bit of a downer given the critical position on crowdsourcing that I took.  While I think a critical eye is necessary to grow the space, I wouldn't want to leave out what's being done well.  With that in mind I wanted to point folks to Patrick Meier's recent post … Continue reading Crowdsourcing Done Well: A follow up from yesterday’s post

Some thoughts on James Mittelman’s “Hyperconflict”

As globalization increasingly impacts the global system of governance and statecraft, traditional analytic frames of sovereignty, power and risk are increasingly unable to account for the emerging challenges of the modern security environment.  James Mittelman describes this new brand of risk as “hyperconflict”, driven by “hyperpower” and “hypercompetition”.  While he does not use the same … Continue reading Some thoughts on James Mittelman’s “Hyperconflict”